Difference between revisions of "Moving Clock Does not Run Slow"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|moving clock does run slow]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 10:43, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Moving Clock Does not Run Slow |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Boon Leong Lan |
Keywords | special relativity, clocks, time |
Published | 2009 |
Journal | None |
No. of pages | 3 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox.