Difference between revisions of "Moving Objects Observation Theory in Place of Special Relativity"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Be carefull: In this paper, 1st line in (9), 2st line in (10), 1st line in (11), 2st line in (12) are wrong. For the correct results, please the paper "Observation Theory of Moving Objects" | Be carefull: In this paper, 1st line in (9), 2st line in (10), 1st line in (11), 2st line in (12) are wrong. For the correct results, please the paper "Observation Theory of Moving Objects" | ||
− | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|moving objects observation theory place special relativity]] |
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 10:43, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Moving Objects Observation Theory in Place of Special Relativity |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Zifeng Li |
Keywords | special relativity, Lorentz transformation, velocity of light, moving objects observation theory |
Published | 2007 |
Journal | None |
No. of pages | 8 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Published in:
- Scientific Inquiry, 8(2): 242-249.
- Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2007,30(4): 11-14. (in simplified Chinese)
- Chinese Academic Forum, 2006, (32):56-58. (in traditional Chinese)
This paper introduces the basic hypotheses and viewpoints on space-time of the special relativity as well as of the moving objects observation theory. It proposes a new concept called the visual space?Ctime and derives the relationship among the realistic space?Ctime of moving coordinate systems, the visual space?Ctime and the realistic space-time of static coordinate systems. From the analysis of comparison, I conclude that the moving objects observation theory has solved the measurement problem of moving objects. Movement cannot cause changes in length, in time or in mass. Also, there does not any light barrier. So the special relativity should be abandoned.
Be carefull: In this paper, 1st line in (9), 2st line in (10), 1st line in (11), 2st line in (12) are wrong. For the correct results, please the paper "Observation Theory of Moving Objects"