Difference between revisions of "Nonconservation of Charge and Energy as Consequences of Contracted Length Noncovariance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Additional arguments against the traditional representation of the contraction of longitudinal sizes of moving bodies are presented. It is shown that the use of noncovariant contracted length leads to violation of the laws of electric charge and energy conservation. | Additional arguments against the traditional representation of the contraction of longitudinal sizes of moving bodies are presented. It is shown that the use of noncovariant contracted length leads to violation of the laws of electric charge and energy conservation. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|nonconservation charge energy consequences contracted length noncovariance]] |
| − | [[Category:New Energy]] | + | [[Category:New Energy|nonconservation charge energy consequences contracted length noncovariance]] |
Latest revision as of 19:45, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Nonconservation of Charge and Energy as Consequences of Contracted Length Noncovariance |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Vyacheslav N Streltsov |
| Keywords | contraction, moving bodies, electric charge and energy conservation |
| Published | 1998 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 1-2 |
| No. of pages | 4 |
| Pages | 55-58 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Additional arguments against the traditional representation of the contraction of longitudinal sizes of moving bodies are presented. It is shown that the use of noncovariant contracted length leads to violation of the laws of electric charge and energy conservation.
