Difference between revisions of "On Lorentz Transformation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|lorentz transformation]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] |
Revision as of 10:48, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | On Lorentz Transformation |
Author(s) | Diego Jos? Arturo Sa |
Keywords | Lorentz Transformation, Speical Relativity, infinitesimals |
Published | 2005 |
Journal | None |
Abstract
The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity.