Difference between revisions of "On Reviving Tired Light"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
(Imported from text file)
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|reviving tired light]]
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|reviving tired light]]
  
[[Category:Cosmology]]
+
[[Category:Cosmology|reviving tired light]]

Latest revision as of 18:46, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title On Reviving Tired Light
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Toivo Jaakkola
Keywords Tired light
Published 1990
Journal Apeiron
Volume 1
Number 6
No. of pages 6
Pages 5-6

Read the full paper here

Abstract

Halton Arp has recently (1989) presented empirical criticisms of the validity of tired-light mechanisms as an explanation of anomalous redshifts. This is extremely welcome and represents the beginning of a true discussion among those who are not content with standard big bang cosmology. The unorthodox theories are legion: there almost as many theories as there are unorthodox thinkers in this domain. This situation is not conducive to advances in our understanding of a difficult problem. Therefore discussion, and even dispute, are necessary, unavoidable and useful. And who has greater right to initiate the discussion than Chip Arp, the pioneer of the field?