Difference between revisions of "On the "Size" of Einstein's Universe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
It is alleged by the Standard Cosmological Model that Einstein?s Universe is finite but unbounded. Although this is a longstanding and widespread allegation, it is nonetheless incorrect. It is also alleged by this Model that the Universe is expanding and that it began with a Big Bang. These are also longstanding and widespread claims that are demonstrably false. The FRWmodels for an expanding, finite, unbounded Universe are inconsistent with General Relativity and are therefore invalid. | It is alleged by the Standard Cosmological Model that Einstein?s Universe is finite but unbounded. Although this is a longstanding and widespread allegation, it is nonetheless incorrect. It is also alleged by this Model that the Universe is expanding and that it began with a Big Bang. These are also longstanding and widespread claims that are demonstrably false. The FRWmodels for an expanding, finite, unbounded Universe are inconsistent with General Relativity and are therefore invalid. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|size einstein 's universe]] |
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 10:51, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On the \"Size\" of Einstein\'s Universe |
| Author(s) | Stephen John Crothers |
| Keywords | Universe Size |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Progress In Physics |
| Volume | 4 |
| Pages | 69-73 |
Abstract
It is alleged by the Standard Cosmological Model that Einstein?s Universe is finite but unbounded. Although this is a longstanding and widespread allegation, it is nonetheless incorrect. It is also alleged by this Model that the Universe is expanding and that it began with a Big Bang. These are also longstanding and widespread claims that are demonstrably false. The FRWmodels for an expanding, finite, unbounded Universe are inconsistent with General Relativity and are therefore invalid.
