Difference between revisions of "On the Derivation of E = mc2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Analysis is presented of the derivation in [1] of what is popularly known as E = mc2. It is emphasized that once a relationship, describing a phenomenon in the stationary system, is known exactly and with certainty, any theory that would derive a different relationship regarding the same phenomenon in terms of the same stationary system should be rejected out of hand.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Analysis is presented of the derivation in [1] of what is popularly known as E = mc2. It is emphasized that once a relationship, describing a phenomenon in the stationary system, is known exactly and with certainty, any theory that would derive a different relationship regarding the same phenomenon in terms of the same stationary system should be rejected out of hand. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|derivation e mc]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:49, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On the Derivation of E = mc2 |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Vesselin C Noninski |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2003 |
| Journal | PhilSci-Archive |
| No. of pages | 10 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Analysis is presented of the derivation in [1] of what is popularly known as E = mc2. It is emphasized that once a relationship, describing a phenomenon in the stationary system, is known exactly and with certainty, any theory that would derive a different relationship regarding the same phenomenon in terms of the same stationary system should be rejected out of hand.
