On the Physical Consistency of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR)
Revision as of 19:47, 1 January 2017 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Imported from text file)
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On the Physical Consistency of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR) |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Vesselin C Noninski |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2003 |
| Journal | PhilSci-Archive |
| No. of pages | 5 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
There are well-established facts whose validity is beyond any doubt, such as the fact that 2 + 2 = 4 or the fact that, say, a lamp that can only flash once in its entire lifetime can only flash at a given coordinate x and at a given time t in a given system O. Such lamp cannot flash at a given moment t at two different coordinates x in this system O. A theory is physically inconsistent if it leads to conclusions which contradict such well-established facts. In this text arguments are given which show that STR leads to conclusions which are in contradiction with well-established facts and therefore it is physically inconsistent.
