Difference between revisions of "On the Regge-Wheeler Tortoise and the Kruskal-Szekeres Coordinates"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
The Regge-Wheeler tortoise ?coordinate? and the the Kruskal-Szekeres ?extension? are built upon a latent set of invalid assumptions. Consequently, they have led to fallacious conclusions about Einstein?s gravitational field. The persistent unjustified claims made for the aforesaid alleged coordinates are not sustained by mathematical rigour. They must therefore be discarded.</p></span></span>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
The Regge-Wheeler tortoise ?coordinate? and the the Kruskal-Szekeres ?extension? are built upon a latent set of invalid assumptions. Consequently, they have led to fallacious conclusions about Einstein?s gravitational field. The persistent unjustified claims made for the aforesaid alleged coordinates are not sustained by mathematical rigour. They must therefore be discarded.</p></span></span>
  
[[Category:Gravity]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|regge-wheeler tortoise kruskal-szekeres coordinates]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Gravity|regge-wheeler tortoise kruskal-szekeres coordinates]]

Latest revision as of 19:48, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title On the Regge-Wheeler Tortoise and the Kruskal-Szekeres Coordinates
Author(s) Stephen John Crothers
Keywords Regge-Wheeler Tortoise, Kruskal-Szekeres Coordinates
Published 2006
Journal Progress In Physics
Volume 3
Pages 30-34

Abstract

The Regge-Wheeler tortoise ?coordinate? and the the Kruskal-Szekeres ?extension? are built upon a latent set of invalid assumptions. Consequently, they have led to fallacious conclusions about Einstein?s gravitational field. The persistent unjustified claims made for the aforesaid alleged coordinates are not sustained by mathematical rigour. They must therefore be discarded.