Difference between revisions of "On the Schr?dinger Equation"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
The derivation of the ?free particle? Schr?dinger equation, based on an analogy between transverse motion of a string surrounded by a viscous medium and massless field propagation in such a medium, is presented It is found that the Schr?dinger equation corresponds to an approximate field equation in which frictional forces dominate. It is argued that Copenhagen and statistical interpretations are incompatible with the present approach. Possible implications on the interpretation problems, especially determinism at a basic level, are discussed.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
The derivation of the ?free particle? Schr?dinger equation, based on an analogy between transverse motion of a string surrounded by a viscous medium and massless field propagation in such a medium, is presented It is found that the Schr?dinger equation corresponds to an approximate field equation in which frictional forces dominate. It is argued that Copenhagen and statistical interpretations are incompatible with the present approach. Possible implications on the interpretation problems, especially determinism at a basic level, are discussed.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|schr dinger equation]]

Latest revision as of 10:51, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title On the Schr?dinger Equation
Author(s) S C Tiwari
Keywords new derivation of the Schr?, dinger equation, massless fields, deterministic interpretation
Published 1989
Journal Physics Essays
Volume 2
Number 1
Pages 31-36

Abstract

The derivation of the ?free particle? Schr?dinger equation, based on an analogy between transverse motion of a string surrounded by a viscous medium and massless field propagation in such a medium, is presented It is found that the Schr?dinger equation corresponds to an approximate field equation in which frictional forces dominate. It is argued that Copenhagen and statistical interpretations are incompatible with the present approach. Possible implications on the interpretation problems, especially determinism at a basic level, are discussed.