Difference between revisions of "Perihelion precession period 400 years old formula found in hiding ending relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | This formula is never seen by anyone before except me and when I discovered it I was 15 years old and it is my first experimentally verified formula for the Perihelion precession period and it has nothing to do with silly relativity theory or any said or published physics. [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | This formula is never seen by anyone before except me and when I discovered it I was 15 years old and it is my first experimentally verified formula for the Perihelion precession period and it has nothing to do with silly relativity theory or any said or published physics. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|perihelion precession period years old formula hiding ending relativity]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity]] | ||
Revision as of 10:52, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Perihelion precession period 400 years old formula found in hiding ending relativity |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Joe Alexander Nahhas |
| Keywords | precession, perihelion, formula, period |
| Published | 1973 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This formula is never seen by anyone before except me and when I discovered it I was 15 years old and it is my first experimentally verified formula for the Perihelion precession period and it has nothing to do with silly relativity theory or any said or published physics.
