Difference between revisions of "Physical Phenomena Understood by Neither Text-Book nor Dissident Physicists"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|physical phenomena understood text-book dissident physicists]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|physical phenomena understood text-book dissident physicists]] | ||
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|physical phenomena understood text-book dissident physicists]] |
Latest revision as of 19:49, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Physical Phenomena Understood by Neither Text-Book nor Dissident Physicists |
Author(s) | Martin M?ller |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2007 |
Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
Volume | 4 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 140 |
Abstract
Initially, the Nobel Prize for physics awarding of 2006 is criticized as erroneous. Then, older errors of physics (also caused by mathematicians) are treated. Of course, Einstein's (AE) errors (=relativity, Lorentz transform) are considered. Then he (AE) is compared with his only serious competitor Bohr (NB). Result is that NB's ?achievements? are more sever in terms of physical errors than the inheritance AE has left.