Difference between revisions of "Piccard-Kessler?s Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
According to the generally accepted opinion, the electric field of a moving charge has the form of oblate revolution ellipsoid in accordance with the Lorentz contraction formula. This picture, however, contradicts the known experiment based on the gas-efflux method. | According to the generally accepted opinion, the electric field of a moving charge has the form of oblate revolution ellipsoid in accordance with the Lorentz contraction formula. This picture, however, contradicts the known experiment based on the gas-efflux method. | ||
− | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|piccard-kessler s experiment vs lorentz contraction]] |
Latest revision as of 10:54, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Piccard-Kessler?s Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Vyacheslav N Streltsov |
Keywords | Lorentz contraction, Heaviside potential, Piccard-Kessler's experiment. |
Published | 2002 |
Journal | Journal of Theoretics |
Volume | 4 |
Number | 5 |
No. of pages | 4 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
According to the generally accepted opinion, the electric field of a moving charge has the form of oblate revolution ellipsoid in accordance with the Lorentz contraction formula. This picture, however, contradicts the known experiment based on the gas-efflux method.