Difference between revisions of "Popper on Necessity and Natural Laws"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
During his philosophical career Karl Popper sought to characterize natural laws alternately as strictly universal and as 'naturally' or 'physically' necessary statements. In this paper we argue that neither characterization does what Popper claimed and sketch a reconstruction of his views that avoids some of their major drawbacks.<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small"> </span> | During his philosophical career Karl Popper sought to characterize natural laws alternately as strictly universal and as 'naturally' or 'physically' necessary statements. In this paper we argue that neither characterization does what Popper claimed and sketch a reconstruction of his views that avoids some of their major drawbacks.<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small"> </span> | ||
| − | [[Category:Book]] | + | [[Category:Book|popper necessity natural laws]] |
Latest revision as of 06:44, 2 January 2017
| Author | Gino Tarozzi |
|---|---|
| Published | 2006 |
| Publisher | Rubbettino Industrie Grafiche ed Editoriali |
During his philosophical career Karl Popper sought to characterize natural laws alternately as strictly universal and as 'naturally' or 'physically' necessary statements. In this paper we argue that neither characterization does what Popper claimed and sketch a reconstruction of his views that avoids some of their major drawbacks.
