Difference between revisions of "Possible Explanation for the Edwards Effect"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
An experiment performed by Edwards <em>et. al. </em>demonstrates the existence of a negative potential on the surface of a superconducting wire which was proportional to the square of the slowly diminishing current in the wire. Conventional electromagnetic theory predicts that this potential should not exist. It is proposed here that the potential results from a force on a charge at rest caused by a magnetic field in motion. | An experiment performed by Edwards <em>et. al. </em>demonstrates the existence of a negative potential on the surface of a superconducting wire which was proportional to the square of the slowly diminishing current in the wire. Conventional electromagnetic theory predicts that this potential should not exist. It is proposed here that the potential results from a force on a charge at rest caused by a magnetic field in motion. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|possible explanation edwards effect]] |
Latest revision as of 10:55, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Possible Explanation for the Edwards Effect |
| Author(s) | Howard C Hayden |
| Keywords | Edwards effect, negative potential, superconducting wire, electromagnetic theory, motion |
| Published | 1990 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 33-42 |
Abstract
An experiment performed by Edwards et. al. demonstrates the existence of a negative potential on the surface of a superconducting wire which was proportional to the square of the slowly diminishing current in the wire. Conventional electromagnetic theory predicts that this potential should not exist. It is proposed here that the potential results from a force on a charge at rest caused by a magnetic field in motion.
