Difference between revisions of "Problems in Physics Which Need Further Investigation"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
Potential problems areas in modern physics are reviewed from a vantage point of extensive experience with the relevant literature. Areas which are well-substantiated by experimental data are discussed first and suggested to be unlikely fields for further research. About an equal number of fields are then discussed which are not well substantiated or even contradicted by research data. These latter fields are deemed to be the most likely ones for future research and technical papers questioning current scientific beliefs.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
Potential problems areas in modern physics are reviewed from a vantage point of extensive experience with the relevant literature. Areas which are well-substantiated by experimental data are discussed first and suggested to be unlikely fields for further research. About an equal number of fields are then discussed which are not well substantiated or even contradicted by research data. These latter fields are deemed to be the most likely ones for future research and technical papers questioning current scientific beliefs.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|problems physics need investigation]]

Latest revision as of 10:56, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Problems in Physics Which Need Further Investigation
Author(s) Howard C Hayden
Keywords {{{keywords}}}
Published 1997
Journal None

Abstract

Potential problems areas in modern physics are reviewed from a vantage point of extensive experience with the relevant literature. Areas which are well-substantiated by experimental data are discussed first and suggested to be unlikely fields for further research. About an equal number of fields are then discussed which are not well substantiated or even contradicted by research data. These latter fields are deemed to be the most likely ones for future research and technical papers questioning current scientific beliefs.