Difference between revisions of "Proof of no "Black Hole" Binary in Nova Scorpii"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
Also published in ''Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Physics and Space Science'' <b>12</b> (4): 1-4 (June 2012). This paper proves in a simple way, with minimal mathematics, that there is no black hole or close black hole binary system in Nova Scorpii, contrary to the published claims of Schmidt et al. (2002). It also proves that the concept of the black hole violates the physical principles of General Relativity and is therefore invalid.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
Also published in ''Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Physics and Space Science'' <b>12</b> (4): 1-4 (June 2012). This paper proves in a simple way, with minimal mathematics, that there is no black hole or close black hole binary system in Nova Scorpii, contrary to the published claims of Schmidt et al. (2002). It also proves that the concept of the black hole violates the physical principles of General Relativity and is therefore invalid.
  
[[Category:Relativity]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|proof black hole binary nova scorpii]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Relativity|proof black hole binary nova scorpii]]

Latest revision as of 19:50, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Proof of no \"Black Hole\" Binary in Nova Scorpii
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Stephen John Crothers
Keywords Black Hole, Black Hole Binary, Nova Scorpii, Michell-Laplace Dark Body, escape velocity
Published 2012
Journal Proceedings of the NPA
Volume 9
No. of pages 3
Pages 111-113

Read the full paper here

Abstract

Also published in Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Physics and Space Science 12 (4): 1-4 (June 2012). This paper proves in a simple way, with minimal mathematics, that there is no black hole or close black hole binary system in Nova Scorpii, contrary to the published claims of Schmidt et al. (2002). It also proves that the concept of the black hole violates the physical principles of General Relativity and is therefore invalid.