Difference between revisions of "Relatively Boring"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | H. Morgan complains in your July issue that relativity is boring. This view will be shared by many physicists, but they do not seem to have noticed that one cause of the confusions and contradictions is that it is not a scientific theory... | + | H. Morgan complains in your July issue that relativity is boring. This view will be shared by many physicists, but they do not seem to have noticed that one cause of the confusions and contradictions is that it is not a scientific theory... |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|relatively boring]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Relativity|relatively boring]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:52, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Relatively Boring |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Burniston Brown |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 1986 |
| Journal | Electronics and Wireless World |
| Number | Feb |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
H. Morgan complains in your July issue that relativity is boring. This view will be shared by many physicists, but they do not seem to have noticed that one cause of the confusions and contradictions is that it is not a scientific theory...
