Difference between revisions of "Relativistic Cosmology Revisited"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativistic cosmology revisited]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|relativistic cosmology revisited]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Cosmology|relativistic cosmology revisited]] |
Latest revision as of 19:52, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Relativistic Cosmology Revisited |
| Author(s) | Stephen John Crothers |
| Keywords | Relativity, Cosmology |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Progress In Physics |
| Volume | 2 |
| Pages | 27-30 |
Abstract
In a previous paper the writer treated of particular classes of cosmological solutions for certain Einstein spaces and claimed that no such solutions exist in relation thereto. In that paper the assumption that the proper radius is zero when the line-element is singular was generally applied. This general assumption is unjustified and must be dropped. Consequently, solutions do exist in relation to the aforementioned types, and are explored herein. The concept of the Big Bang cosmology is found to be inconsistent with General Relativity.
