Difference between revisions of "Sandage Versus Hubble on the Reality of the Expanding Universe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | A critical reading of Lubin & Sandage?s 2001 paper on the Tolman effect for the reality of the expansion of the universe clearly reveals that Sandage is far from winning the dispute with Hubble on the issue. After all the years, Hubble?s doubt about the reality of the expansion remains as valid as Sandage?s certainty expressed in a series of papers in the last decade.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | A critical reading of Lubin & Sandage?s 2001 paper on the Tolman effect for the reality of the expansion of the universe clearly reveals that Sandage is far from winning the dispute with Hubble on the issue. After all the years, Hubble?s doubt about the reality of the expansion remains as valid as Sandage?s certainty expressed in a series of papers in the last decade. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|sandage versus hubble reality expanding universe]] | ||
[[Category:Cosmology]] | [[Category:Cosmology]] | ||
Revision as of 11:02, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Sandage Versus Hubble on the Reality of the Expanding Universe |
| Author(s) | Domingos Soares |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | ArXiv |
| No. of pages | 13 |
Abstract
A critical reading of Lubin & Sandage?s 2001 paper on the Tolman effect for the reality of the expansion of the universe clearly reveals that Sandage is far from winning the dispute with Hubble on the issue. After all the years, Hubble?s doubt about the reality of the expansion remains as valid as Sandage?s certainty expressed in a series of papers in the last decade.
