Difference between revisions of "Sandage Versus Hubble on the Reality of the Expanding Universe"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
A critical reading of Lubin & Sandage?s 2001 paper on the Tolman  effect for the reality of the expansion of the universe clearly reveals  that Sandage is far from winning the dispute with Hubble on the issue.  After all the years, Hubble?s doubt about the reality of the expansion  remains as valid as Sandage?s certainty expressed in a series of papers  in the last decade.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
A critical reading of Lubin & Sandage?s 2001 paper on the Tolman  effect for the reality of the expansion of the universe clearly reveals  that Sandage is far from winning the dispute with Hubble on the issue.  After all the years, Hubble?s doubt about the reality of the expansion  remains as valid as Sandage?s certainty expressed in a series of papers  in the last decade.
  
[[Category:Cosmology]]
+
[[Category:Scientific Paper|sandage versus hubble reality expanding universe]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Cosmology|sandage versus hubble reality expanding universe]]

Latest revision as of 19:54, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title Sandage Versus Hubble on the Reality of the Expanding Universe
Author(s) Domingos Soares
Keywords {{{keywords}}}
Published 2008
Journal ArXiv
No. of pages 13

Abstract

A critical reading of Lubin & Sandage?s 2001 paper on the Tolman effect for the reality of the expansion of the universe clearly reveals that Sandage is far from winning the dispute with Hubble on the issue. After all the years, Hubble?s doubt about the reality of the expansion remains as valid as Sandage?s certainty expressed in a series of papers in the last decade.