Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Create the page "Moving observer" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- ...= Contrary to Wilczynski, There is No Aberration for Co-moving Source and Observer | keywords = [[Aberration]], [[Motion]], [[Source]], [[Observer]]418 bytes (42 words) - 10:11, 1 January 2017
- | title = The Gravitational Potential for a Moving Observer, the Perihelion Shift of Mercury, and Photon Deflection | keywords = [[Gravitational Potential]], [[Observer]], [[Perihelion Shift of Mercury]], [[Photon Deflection]]659 bytes (71 words) - 20:02, 1 January 2017
- | title = The Gravitational Potential for a Moving Observer, Mercury\'s Perihelion, Photon Deflection and Time Delay of a Solar Grazing ...ed that Newton's gravitational potential applies only for static or slowly moving objects. The addition of velocity dependent terms, derivable from the prin1 KB (185 words) - 20:02, 1 January 2017
Page text matches
- ...= Contrary to Wilczynski, There is No Aberration for Co-moving Source and Observer | keywords = [[Aberration]], [[Motion]], [[Source]], [[Observer]]418 bytes (42 words) - 10:11, 1 January 2017
- | title = The Gravitational Potential for a Moving Observer, the Perihelion Shift of Mercury, and Photon Deflection | keywords = [[Gravitational Potential]], [[Observer]], [[Perihelion Shift of Mercury]], [[Photon Deflection]]659 bytes (71 words) - 20:02, 1 January 2017
- ...relativistic phenomenon. The case in which an arbitrary force acts on an observer undergoing uniform, relativistic translation in Minkowski space-time is the1 KB (195 words) - 19:38, 1 January 2017
- | title = The Gravitational Potential for a Moving Observer, Mercury\'s Perihelion, Photon Deflection and Time Delay of a Solar Grazing ...ed that Newton's gravitational potential applies only for static or slowly moving objects. The addition of velocity dependent terms, derivable from the prin1 KB (185 words) - 20:02, 1 January 2017
- ...heory of relativity, the co-moving inertial "lab partner" of this circling observer must interpret that this same observation shows the center clock is running1 KB (201 words) - 20:05, 1 January 2017
- ...both ends simultaneously and disagrees with the tiem order claimed by the observer on the train. If motion is relative, said Einstein, who is to say that one2 KB (244 words) - 19:37, 1 January 2017
- ...of light from Jupiter's satellite was lower when an observer on earth was moving away from it, and higher on approach. The red-shift of spectral lines may b ...ed that the speed of light from the star Gamma draconis was higher when an observer on earth moved towards its perpendicular incident, and lower on recession.2 KB (299 words) - 11:06, 1 January 2017
- ...elativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, an ...ecraft (perpendicular to the spacecraft's motion). On the Earth is another observer."''6 KB (1,092 words) - 10:48, 9 April 2017
- ...n relativity of simultaneity has a num-ber of implications, including that moving observers can no longer maintain (a) that their clocks are unslowed, (b) th3 KB (454 words) - 19:32, 1 January 2017
- ...as moving with recessional velocity proportional to the distance from the observer. The observed velocity proportional to the distance is thus the result of t1 KB (189 words) - 11:24, 1 January 2017
- ...r faster or slower than a component traveling at ''c'' as measured by that observer. It is this peculiar nature of light that led to the development of specia2 KB (277 words) - 19:34, 1 January 2017
- ...erent velocities depends on, which one of two is formally considered as an observer. It is proposed to consider LTT as an alternative to SRT.1 KB (212 words) - 20:08, 1 January 2017
- ...n. This paper explains clearly why the velocity is really (c-v), while the observer's tools always measure a velocity represented by the number c. This illusio1 KB (193 words) - 11:10, 1 January 2017
- ...k. And the Light Principle has Corollary (C) in which each un-accelerated observer acknowledges that an outbound light ray has the same speed as an inbound l ...Consequence [III] an observer perceives that a stern clock on a relatively moving spaceship is in advance of the bow clock of that ship, provided the astron4 KB (584 words) - 19:38, 1 January 2017
- ...locity of light is really (c-v) with respect to the observer, even if the observer's tools always measure a velocity represented by the number c. We explain2 KB (234 words) - 19:32, 1 January 2017
- ...is a glaring error to ascribe the electrodynamics of moving bodies to any observer's observation.1,007 bytes (140 words) - 19:14, 1 January 2017
- ...quite useless. This apparent constant velocity of light with respect to a moving frame is the most fascinating illusion in science.2 KB (306 words) - 20:02, 1 January 2017
- ...e analogy that allows for ?Galilean? addition of the c and v vectors for a moving source of light? And from Renshaw's Radiation Continuum Model approach, co3 KB (459 words) - 20:08, 1 January 2017
- ...peeds <em>c',</em> relative to the source and <em>c',</em> relative to the observer, different from Einstein's constant <em>c<sub>o</sub>.</em> This viewp2 KB (260 words) - 19:52, 1 January 2017
- ...rentz invariance; the speed of light seems to depend on the motion of the observer after all, as in classical wave theory, which implies that a preferred ref1 KB (170 words) - 19:41, 1 January 2017