Difference between revisions of "Speculations on the Evans-Comay Discussion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
It is proved that necessary corrections in the Evans-Viger modified electrodynamics invalidate the arguments given by E. Comay [CPL 261 (1996) 601] against this model. From the conceptual viewpoint the Evans/Comay discussions in several journals have created much confusion. | It is proved that necessary corrections in the Evans-Viger modified electrodynamics invalidate the arguments given by E. Comay [CPL 261 (1996) 601] against this model. From the conceptual viewpoint the Evans/Comay discussions in several journals have created much confusion. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|speculations evans-comay discussion]] |
| − | [[Category:Electrodynamics]] | + | [[Category:Electrodynamics|speculations evans-comay discussion]] |
Latest revision as of 19:56, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Speculations on the Evans-Comay Discussion |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Valeri V Dvoeglazov |
| Keywords | Evans-Viger, modified electrodynamics, Evans/Comay discussions |
| Published | 1999 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 3-4 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 227-232 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
It is proved that necessary corrections in the Evans-Viger modified electrodynamics invalidate the arguments given by E. Comay [CPL 261 (1996) 601] against this model. From the conceptual viewpoint the Evans/Comay discussions in several journals have created much confusion.
