Difference between revisions of "Stellar Aberration from the Standpoint of the Radiation Convection Hypothesis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | A previously advanced hypothesis of radiation convection by the absorber, deduced from the so-called neo-Hertzian electomagnetism, is tested for its ability to account for the facts of stellar aberration. The test is passed at first order. Satellite astronomy may in the future offer some hope of observationally distinguishing this theory from special relativity. | + | A previously advanced hypothesis of radiation convection by the absorber, deduced from the so-called neo-Hertzian electomagnetism, is tested for its ability to account for the facts of stellar aberration. The test is passed at first order. Satellite astronomy may in the future offer some hope of observationally distinguishing this theory from special relativity. |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|stellar aberration standpoint radiation convection hypothesis]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Relativity|stellar aberration standpoint radiation convection hypothesis]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:56, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Stellar Aberration from the Standpoint of the Radiation Convection Hypothesis |
| Author(s) | Thomas E Phipps |
| Keywords | Stellar Aberration, Radiation Convection |
| Published | 1991 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 368-372 |
Abstract
A previously advanced hypothesis of radiation convection by the absorber, deduced from the so-called neo-Hertzian electomagnetism, is tested for its ability to account for the facts of stellar aberration. The test is passed at first order. Satellite astronomy may in the future offer some hope of observationally distinguishing this theory from special relativity.
