Difference between revisions of "The B(3) Field Controversy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The controversy generated by the theory of the B(3) magnetic field is considered in the light of a paradox raised by E. Comay and its repudiation by M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers. Their arguments are examined and assessed.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The controversy generated by the theory of the B(3) magnetic field is considered in the light of a paradox raised by E. Comay and its repudiation by M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers. Their arguments are examined and assessed. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|b field controversy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:10, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The B(3) Field Controversy |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Geoffrey Hunter |
| Keywords | Stokes Theorem, Myron Evans, B(3) Magnetic Field |
| Published | 2000 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | 1-2 |
| No. of pages | 12 |
| Pages | 17-28 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The controversy generated by the theory of the B(3) magnetic field is considered in the light of a paradox raised by E. Comay and its repudiation by M. W. Evans and S. Jeffers. Their arguments are examined and assessed.
