Difference between revisions of "The Death of Electric Current"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | A major advance in electromagnetic theory, which I shall call the transition from Theory N to Theory H, was made by Oliver Heaviside a century ago. What is proposed here is a transition from Theory H to a third theory, Theory C. It is to be hoped that the response to Theory C will be more perceptive than was the general response to Theory H a century ago?[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | A major advance in electromagnetic theory, which I shall call the transition from Theory N to Theory H, was made by Oliver Heaviside a century ago. What is proposed here is a transition from Theory H to a third theory, Theory C. It is to be hoped that the response to Theory C will be more perceptive than was the general response to Theory H a century ago? |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|death electric current]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:12, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Death of Electric Current |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Ivor Catt |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 1982 |
| Journal | Wireless World |
| Volume | Dec |
| Pages | 79-81 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
A major advance in electromagnetic theory, which I shall call the transition from Theory N to Theory H, was made by Oliver Heaviside a century ago. What is proposed here is a transition from Theory H to a third theory, Theory C. It is to be hoped that the response to Theory C will be more perceptive than was the general response to Theory H a century ago?
