Difference between revisions of "The Kruskal-Szekeres ?Extension?: Counter-Examples"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
The Kruskal-Szekeres ?coordinates? are said to ?extend? the so-called ?Schwarzschild solution?, to remove an alleged ?coordinate singularity? at the event horizon of a black hole at r = 2m, leaving an infinitely dense point-mass singularity at ?the origin? r = 0. However, the assumption that the point at the centre of spherical symmetry of the ?Schwarzschild solution? is at ?the origin? r = 0 is erroneous, and so the Kruskal-  Szekeres ?extension? is invalid; demonstrated herein by simple counter-examples.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
The Kruskal-Szekeres ?coordinates? are said to ?extend? the so-called ?Schwarzschild solution?, to remove an alleged ?coordinate singularity? at the event horizon of a black hole at r = 2m, leaving an infinitely dense point-mass singularity at ?the origin? r = 0. However, the assumption that the point at the centre of spherical symmetry of the ?Schwarzschild solution? is at ?the origin? r = 0 is erroneous, and so the Kruskal-  Szekeres ?extension? is invalid; demonstrated herein by simple counter-examples.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|kruskal-szekeres extension counter-examples]]

Latest revision as of 11:17, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title The Kruskal-Szekeres ?Extension?: Counter-Examples
Read in full Link to paper
Author(s) Stephen John Crothers
Keywords {{{keywords}}}
Published 2009
Journal Progress In Physics
No. of pages 5

Read the full paper here

Abstract

The Kruskal-Szekeres ?coordinates? are said to ?extend? the so-called ?Schwarzschild solution?, to remove an alleged ?coordinate singularity? at the event horizon of a black hole at r = 2m, leaving an infinitely dense point-mass singularity at ?the origin? r = 0. However, the assumption that the point at the centre of spherical symmetry of the ?Schwarzschild solution? is at ?the origin? r = 0 is erroneous, and so the Kruskal- Szekeres ?extension? is invalid; demonstrated herein by simple counter-examples.