Difference between revisions of "The Need for a Critical Reappraisal of Einstein?s General Relativity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|need critical reappraisal einstein s general relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|need critical reappraisal einstein s general relativity]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|need critical reappraisal einstein s general relativity]] |
Latest revision as of 20:04, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Need for a Critical Reappraisal of Einstein?s General Relativity |
| Author(s) | John Carstoiu |
| Keywords | General Relativity |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
There are a great number of gravitational phenomena an which Einstein?s theory throws no light. for instance, it is very odd that neither Newton?s Law or Einstein?s Relativity can explain the rotations of the planets. Everybody takes the rotation of a planet for granted, but would the latter admit an explanation as planetary orbits do?
... The curved space-tiem universe of Einstein is a splendid object of mathematics, but what about its physical reality? ... There is no expefimental checkto support the very heavy mathematical structure of purely mathematica extensions, compliments or modifications of the original theory - without any additional experimental evidence.
