Difference between revisions of "The Philadelphia Experiment Revisited ? Part I"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | This essay is the first part of a two-part critique of what is called the Philadelphia Experiment and will focus on the experiment as a possible episode in naval history. It asks a simple question: Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? This essay applies an historical methodology to answer that question.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | This essay is the first part of a two-part critique of what is called the Philadelphia Experiment and will focus on the experiment as a possible episode in naval history. It asks a simple question: Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? This essay applies an historical methodology to answer that question. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|philadelphia experiment revisited]] |
Latest revision as of 11:22, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | The Philadelphia Experiment Revisited ? Part I |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Joseph Pothier |
Keywords | history, investigative report, Philadelphia experiment |
Published | 1992 |
Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
Number | 7 |
No. of pages | 8 |
Pages | 15-25 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This essay is the first part of a two-part critique of what is called the Philadelphia Experiment and will focus on the experiment as a possible episode in naval history. It asks a simple question: Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? This essay applies an historical methodology to answer that question.