Difference between revisions of "The Space of Local Hidden Variables Cannot be a Metric One and What Next?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
The results of the recent investigations of the problems considered are shortly recapitulated in Sec. 2-3. The simple relativistic model is introduced in Sec. 4, where the problem of locality is considered together with the classical and nonclassical features of RM. | The results of the recent investigations of the problems considered are shortly recapitulated in Sec. 2-3. The simple relativistic model is introduced in Sec. 4, where the problem of locality is considered together with the classical and nonclassical features of RM. | ||
− | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|space local hidden variables metric]] |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|space local hidden variables metric]] |
Latest revision as of 20:07, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | The Space of Local Hidden Variables Cannot be a Metric One and What Next? |
Author(s) | Milan Vinduska |
Keywords | hidden variables, metric content, Bell inequalities, phenomena isotropy, space, quantum mechanics |
Published | 1994 |
Pages | 575-581 |
Abstract
Metric content of the Bell inequalities for the side range of phenomena can be interpreted as a consequence of the isotropy of the hidden variable space defined by measuring devices.
The destroyed isotropy of such a space is described by the relative measure of probabability ( = RM )1, which permits one to restore the quantum mechanical results in the language of local hidden variables.
The results of the recent investigations of the problems considered are shortly recapitulated in Sec. 2-3. The simple relativistic model is introduced in Sec. 4, where the problem of locality is considered together with the classical and nonclassical features of RM.