Difference between revisions of "The Troubled Theories of Magnetic Induction"

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Imported from text file)
 
(Imported from text file)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
| title = The Troubled Theories of Magnetic Induction
 
| title = The Troubled Theories of Magnetic Induction
 
| author = [[David L Bergman]]
 
| author = [[David L Bergman]]
| keywords = [[Magnetism]], [[Motors]], [[Field]], [[Flux]], [[Generators]], [[Faraday]]
+
| keywords = [[physical interpretation]], [[point particles]], [[ring theory of the electron]]
| published = 2000
+
| published = 2005
| journal = [[Foundations of Science]]
+
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]]
| volume = [[3]]
+
| number = [[39]]
| number = [[3]]
+
| pages = 12-15
| num_pages = 8
 
 
}}
 
}}
  
 
==Abstract==
 
==Abstract==
  
Faraday's Law of Magnetic Induction has a special role in fundamental, theoretical physics. This is the law that predicts electricity from magnetism, the law that describes time and process rates, and the law that governs electric motors and most of modern technology. Despite its great importance, fidelity to experimental data, and early quantitative treatment by Neumann1 in 1845, the law has continually been modified, reformulated, and ignored in favor of inferior hypotheses.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
+
By accepting that protons and electrons have volume, and are not the point particles approximated in classical calculations, fundamental forces exerted by fundamental particles can account for phenomena explained only in terms of useful fictions by mainstream science.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Scientific Paper|troubled theories magnetic induction]]

Latest revision as of 11:29, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
Title The Troubled Theories of Magnetic Induction
Author(s) David L Bergman
Keywords physical interpretation, point particles, ring theory of the electron
Published 2005
Journal Electric Spacecraft Journal
Number 39
Pages 12-15

Abstract

By accepting that protons and electrons have volume, and are not the point particles approximated in classical calculations, fundamental forces exerted by fundamental particles can account for phenomena explained only in terms of useful fictions by mainstream science.