Difference between revisions of "The Unsoundness of Special Relativity Theory"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This paper gives mathematical grounds to the argument that Lorentz?s transformations are deduced with the violation of logic and elementary mathematical rules. To accord the laws of mechanics and electrodynamics there must be introduced a concept of ?imaginary motion?, which should be grounded logically. There is a proposal of setting two experiments that confirm the existence of an ether. There is an explanation of Fizeau?s experiment and the fact that during the Earth?s movement along its trajectory, the molecules of air remain. | This paper gives mathematical grounds to the argument that Lorentz?s transformations are deduced with the violation of logic and elementary mathematical rules. To accord the laws of mechanics and electrodynamics there must be introduced a concept of ?imaginary motion?, which should be grounded logically. There is a proposal of setting two experiments that confirm the existence of an ether. There is an explanation of Fizeau?s experiment and the fact that during the Earth?s movement along its trajectory, the molecules of air remain. | ||
− | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|unsoundness special relativity theory]] |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|unsoundness special relativity theory]] |
Latest revision as of 20:09, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | The Unsoundness of Special Relativity Theory |
Author(s) | Vladimir P Lavrushkin |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2007 |
Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
Volume | 18 |
Number | S1 |
Pages | 18-20 |
Abstract
This paper gives mathematical grounds to the argument that Lorentz?s transformations are deduced with the violation of logic and elementary mathematical rules. To accord the laws of mechanics and electrodynamics there must be introduced a concept of ?imaginary motion?, which should be grounded logically. There is a proposal of setting two experiments that confirm the existence of an ether. There is an explanation of Fizeau?s experiment and the fact that during the Earth?s movement along its trajectory, the molecules of air remain.