Difference between revisions of "The Wave and Ballistic Theories of Light: A Critical Review"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Links to Purchase Book== | ==Links to Purchase Book== | ||
| − | * [[http://www.amazon.com/wave-ballistic-theories-light-critical/dp/0584101481/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1218937194&sr=1-1 The Wave and Ballistic Theories of Light: A Critical Review]][[Category:Book]] | + | * [[http://www.amazon.com/wave-ballistic-theories-light-critical/dp/0584101481/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1218937194&sr=1-1 The Wave and Ballistic Theories of Light: A Critical Review]][[Category:Book|wave ballistic theories light critical review]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|wave ballistic theories light critical review]] |
Latest revision as of 06:55, 2 January 2017
| Author | Richard A Waldron |
|---|---|
| Published | 1977 |
| Publisher | F. Muller |
| Pages | 201 |
| ISBN | 0584101481 |
Waldron developed a ballistic theory of light on his own before learning that Walter Ritz had already done it at about the time that A. Einstein developed his 'Special Relativity'. Waldron shows with mathematical accuracy and in excruciating detail, one by one, that all the so called proofs of Einsteinian relativity (approx. 20) aren't proof at all but that the experimental and observational results can be just as well explained with the more pedestrian Ritzian relativity. Unfortunately the books writing style is extremely dry and the backreferencing to figures and what was said earlier is hard to follow (References are to sections, but the pages have no section headers). But he is so detailed and conscientous in his proofs, that its a book worth having for any 'dissenter' regarding Einsteinian Relativity, special or general. Quasi a 'dissenters' bible'. I finally decided to get my hands on the book after seeing it being quoted in many 'dissenter' articles. - Walter G. Hecker, Amazon
