Difference between revisions of "Time Will Tell"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
This essay is about TIME, DURATION and MOTION. I venture to argue that our current theory of TIME is wrong, that duration is impossible and that MOTION is everything. I will explain that there is no such concept as TIME that has a unique "dimension" or defines "duration". That TIME is just a miss-interpretation of our attempts to describe simple motion. | This essay is about TIME, DURATION and MOTION. I venture to argue that our current theory of TIME is wrong, that duration is impossible and that MOTION is everything. I will explain that there is no such concept as TIME that has a unique "dimension" or defines "duration". That TIME is just a miss-interpretation of our attempts to describe simple motion. | ||
| − | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|time tell]] |
Latest revision as of 11:32, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Time Will Tell |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Craig D Hanks |
| Keywords | TIME, DURATION, MOTION |
| Published | 1998 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 10 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This essay is about TIME, DURATION and MOTION. I venture to argue that our current theory of TIME is wrong, that duration is impossible and that MOTION is everything. I will explain that there is no such concept as TIME that has a unique "dimension" or defines "duration". That TIME is just a miss-interpretation of our attempts to describe simple motion.
