Difference between revisions of "Twin Paradox Project Update Including the Mainstream Response"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | A brief discussion of the 'Open Letter On The Twin Paradox' and the other 10 supporting pages in the web site are described. A summary of the findings of the associated study Report is given. Special attention is focused on the mainstream response including a persistent flaw.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | A brief discussion of the 'Open Letter On The Twin Paradox' and the other 10 supporting pages in the web site are described. A summary of the findings of the associated study Report is given. Special attention is focused on the mainstream response including a persistent flaw. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|twin paradox project update including mainstream response]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 11:34, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Twin Paradox Project Update Including the Mainstream Response |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Nick Percival |
| Keywords | Twin Paradox, proper time, special relativity, GPS |
| Published | 2012 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 9 |
| No. of pages | 5 |
| Pages | 417-421 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
A brief discussion of the 'Open Letter On The Twin Paradox' and the other 10 supporting pages in the web site are described. A summary of the findings of the associated study Report is given. Special attention is focused on the mainstream response including a persistent flaw.
