Difference between revisions of "Twin Paradox Project Update Including the Mainstream Response"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | A brief discussion of the 'Open Letter On The Twin Paradox' and the other 10 supporting pages in the web site are described. A summary of the findings of the associated study Report is given. Special attention is focused on the mainstream response including a persistent flaw. | + | A brief discussion of the 'Open Letter On The Twin Paradox' and the other 10 supporting pages in the web site are described. A summary of the findings of the associated study Report is given. Special attention is focused on the mainstream response including a persistent flaw. |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|twin paradox project update including mainstream response]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Relativity|twin paradox project update including mainstream response]] |
Latest revision as of 20:11, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Twin Paradox Project Update Including the Mainstream Response |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Nick Percival |
Keywords | Twin Paradox, proper time, special relativity, GPS |
Published | 2012 |
Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
Volume | 9 |
No. of pages | 5 |
Pages | 417-421 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
A brief discussion of the 'Open Letter On The Twin Paradox' and the other 10 supporting pages in the web site are described. A summary of the findings of the associated study Report is given. Special attention is focused on the mainstream response including a persistent flaw.