Difference between revisions of "Velocity Effects on Atomic Clocks and the Time Question"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | The experimental and theoretical work of Herbert Ives is presented as a logical alternative to Einstein's special theory of relativity. Rotational experiments are shown to indicate a light-beating medium, refuting thefoundations of special relativity. The relativity concept of time dilation is replaced by physically produced clock rate reduction when clocks move through the reference medium. The common sense concept of time is upheld as a fundamental quantity of science. The philosophy of relativism is shown to be detrimental to science. | + | The experimental and theoretical work of Herbert Ives is presented as a logical alternative to Einstein's special theory of relativity. Rotational experiments are shown to indicate a light-beating medium, refuting thefoundations of special relativity. The relativity concept of time dilation is replaced by physically produced clock rate reduction when clocks move through the reference medium. The common sense concept of time is upheld as a fundamental quantity of science. The philosophy of relativism is shown to be detrimental to science. |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|velocity effects atomic clocks time question]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Relativity|velocity effects atomic clocks time question]] |
Latest revision as of 20:12, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Velocity Effects on Atomic Clocks and the Time Question |
Author(s) | Thomas G Barnes, Francisco S Ramirez |
Keywords | Velocity, Atomic Clocks, Time |
Published | 1982 |
Journal | Creation Research Society Quarterly |
Volume | 18 |
Number | 4 |
Abstract
The experimental and theoretical work of Herbert Ives is presented as a logical alternative to Einstein's special theory of relativity. Rotational experiments are shown to indicate a light-beating medium, refuting thefoundations of special relativity. The relativity concept of time dilation is replaced by physically produced clock rate reduction when clocks move through the reference medium. The common sense concept of time is upheld as a fundamental quantity of science. The philosophy of relativism is shown to be detrimental to science.