Difference between revisions of "Was Einstein a Berkeleian?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | Ilse Rosenthal-Schneider writes that "reality of the external world" is something Einstein "does not discuss." Perhaps more important than any discussion that Einstein might have offered is the implication of his special theory of relativity. It is possible to deduce that he in practice regularly conceived no reality except sense-experience... | + | Ilse Rosenthal-Schneider writes that "reality of the external world" is something Einstein "does not discuss." Perhaps more important than any discussion that Einstein might have offered is the implication of his special theory of relativity. It is possible to deduce that he in practice regularly conceived no reality except sense-experience... |
− | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|einstein berkeleian]] |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Relativity|einstein berkeleian]] |
Latest revision as of 20:12, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Was Einstein a Berkeleian? |
Author(s) | Harry E Mongold |
Keywords | Einstein. Mach's Principle, Berkeley |
Published | 1979 |
Journal | Pursuit |
Volume | 12 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 175-177 |
Abstract
Ilse Rosenthal-Schneider writes that "reality of the external world" is something Einstein "does not discuss." Perhaps more important than any discussion that Einstein might have offered is the implication of his special theory of relativity. It is possible to deduce that he in practice regularly conceived no reality except sense-experience...