Difference between revisions of "What Happened? Are We Asking or Telling?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|happened asking telling]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|happened asking telling]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Aether]] | + | [[Category:Aether|happened asking telling]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|happened asking telling]] |
| − | [[Category:Unified Theory]] | + | [[Category:Unified Theory|happened asking telling]] |
| − | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Cosmology|happened asking telling]] |
Latest revision as of 20:13, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | What Happened? Are We Asking or Telling? |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Marvin Eli Kirsh |
| Keywords | scientific cultural social political economic evolution, abstraction, representation of nature, marxism, capitolism, relativity, model of volume, aceticism, religion and science, space and volume, [[]] |
| Published | 2009 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 15 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
A conceptual parallel is created between studies in anthropology and natural science. A space occupied by ?the conceptualization? is argued to not only parallel symbolically the scientifically conceived value of volume as space, but to have an equal meaning- the spaces of the conceptual ordering of nature as manifestations of energy are held to be paralleling manifestations of the same energies that mold the environment. A growing historical asceticism attributed to the individual in struggles with nature and himself becomes destructive universally as the consequence of scientific activities that are focused from raw curiosities that are distant from real symbolic meaning.
