Difference between revisions of "Where are the Stars 1977? Venus as a Proof of Stars Misplacement"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|stars venus proof stars misplacement]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|stars venus proof stars misplacement]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Gravity]] | + | [[Category:Gravity|stars venus proof stars misplacement]] |
| − | [[Category:New Energy]] | + | [[Category:New Energy|stars venus proof stars misplacement]] |
| − | [[Category:Relativity]] | + | [[Category:Relativity|stars venus proof stars misplacement]] |
| − | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Cosmology|stars venus proof stars misplacement]] |
Latest revision as of 20:13, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Where are the Stars 1977? Venus as a Proof of Stars Misplacement |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Joe Alexander Nahhas |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 1977 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 7 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Stars and planets locations reading are incorrect. Planets and stars documented and published data shwoing aixal rotations rates have/had matched projected light aberrations visual effects measurements meaning if light aberrations are taken into considerations while collecting these data then this axial rotation is "apparent" and not real. The dependence of locations of planets and stars on light measurements with no light aberration correction associated with each measurement indicates planets and stars are as being "not exactly" where they are said or published to be
