Difference between revisions of "Consistency Test of an Alternative Kinematics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | A proposed alternative to Einstein's kinematics, based on the postulated invariance 1) of particle proper time and 2) of object length (i.e., nonoccurrence of the Lorentz contraction), is tested for its ability to exhibit consistency between the aging rates of an accelerated 'light clock' and its comoving observer. The problem is nontrivial because the altered kinematics requires employment of an altered electromagnetism, the so-called 'neo-Hertzian' generalization of Maxwell's theory, which is invariant under inertial transformations. Difficulties of crucial experimentation are touched upon.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | A proposed alternative to Einstein's kinematics, based on the postulated invariance 1) of particle proper time and 2) of object length (i.e., nonoccurrence of the Lorentz contraction), is tested for its ability to exhibit consistency between the aging rates of an accelerated 'light clock' and its comoving observer. The problem is nontrivial because the altered kinematics requires employment of an altered electromagnetism, the so-called 'neo-Hertzian' generalization of Maxwell's theory, which is invariant under inertial transformations. Difficulties of crucial experimentation are touched upon. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|consistency test alternative kinematics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:11, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Consistency Test of an Alternative Kinematics |
| Author(s) | Thomas E Phipps |
| Keywords | Kinematics |
| Published | 1989 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 2 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 380-384 |
Abstract
A proposed alternative to Einstein's kinematics, based on the postulated invariance 1) of particle proper time and 2) of object length (i.e., nonoccurrence of the Lorentz contraction), is tested for its ability to exhibit consistency between the aging rates of an accelerated 'light clock' and its comoving observer. The problem is nontrivial because the altered kinematics requires employment of an altered electromagnetism, the so-called 'neo-Hertzian' generalization of Maxwell's theory, which is invariant under inertial transformations. Difficulties of crucial experimentation are touched upon.
