Flowing view 2
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Flowing view 2 |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Paul Schroeder |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2014 |
Journal | None |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Key cosmology issues
Infinity ? of space; of size; of time
Contents of universe ? gravity; light/EM radiation; 3 dimensions; flowing
everywhere=curvature;
Transference from one center to another changes everything. Tycho Brahe ? earth
center; Kepler/Newton ? sun center (solar system); External Gravity-
relates all to space rather than all to a mass body as per Tom VanFlandern
Intersecting radiation ? non-interference; star beam to us intersected by light from all
other stars; radiation penetrates matter
Perspectives ? revolution and rotation; newborn sees motions vs turning her head;
Copernicus motions and rotations
Curvature ? source ? rotation varies space everywhere; no fixed math; relativity=time
adj, gravity wells and fixed C; astrophysics deals with curvature
plotting patched conic orbits, cosmology has avoided variable curvature
caused by all relevant rotations.
Interactions ? of light and gravity incl. redshift; of all Em radiations; centric force of
gravity vs remote sourced light. Seeking common equilibrium of both.
Aberration ? rotation; C vs 2M/sec, C vs 30 M/sec; linear vs rotational motion
Flatness - re earth= 2 dimensions = invalid; flat space= 3 dimensions=valid= our visual
structure; Cosmos avoids flat space comparison vs big bang
Simplicity ? External Gravitation is an easier perspective. Then education teaches us
complex physics theories; System is more thorough via different
perspective. All calculations are re local relationships.
Reality with logic rather than speculative new concepts. Directional logic
of flow negates value of math analysis, devaluing mainstream technical
science. If only clearing up many confusing ideas throughout physics was
as desirable as devising a new math formula.
<o:p> </o:p>