Difference between revisions of "Plate Tectonics Subducted"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | Following the devastating tsunami on Boxing Day 2004, there was a lot of talk about how the subduction of the Indian plate beneath Indonesia was the root cause of the earthquake that triggered the disaster. However, a significant number of earth scientists dispute the existence of subduction and question the classical plate-tectonic model of which it forms part (see Meyerhoff et al., 1996; Pratt, 2000, 2001; Smoot, 2001; Smoot et al., 2001a,b; Storetvedt, 1997).[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | Following the devastating tsunami on Boxing Day 2004, there was a lot of talk about how the subduction of the Indian plate beneath Indonesia was the root cause of the earthquake that triggered the disaster. However, a significant number of earth scientists dispute the existence of subduction and question the classical plate-tectonic model of which it forms part (see Meyerhoff et al., 1996; Pratt, 2000, 2001; Smoot, 2001; Smoot et al., 2001a,b; Storetvedt, 1997). |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|plate tectonics subducted]] | ||
[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]] | [[Category:Expansion Tectonics]] |
Revision as of 10:54, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Plate Tectonics Subducted |
Author(s) | Dong R Choi |
Keywords | subduction |
Published | 2004 |
Journal | None |
Abstract
Following the devastating tsunami on Boxing Day 2004, there was a lot of talk about how the subduction of the Indian plate beneath Indonesia was the root cause of the earthquake that triggered the disaster. However, a significant number of earth scientists dispute the existence of subduction and question the classical plate-tectonic model of which it forms part (see Meyerhoff et al., 1996; Pratt, 2000, 2001; Smoot, 2001; Smoot et al., 2001a,b; Storetvedt, 1997).