Difference between revisions of "Quantum Correlations From a Logical Point of View"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | Quantum mechanical correlations have been thought of as a paradox or, alternatively, as a sign of <em>incompleteness</em> of standard quantum theory. Certainly, from a logical point of view, paradox and incompleteness are not equivalent. The concept of "paradox" is thus analyzed and the possible ways out discussed. The so-called EPR-<em>paradox</em> is recast in an elementary logical form of a "debate argument", i.e., where two seemingly sound arguments contradict each other. A way out of it, that of <em>adding new dimensions, </em>is discussed and a very general mathematical formulation if offered. | + | Quantum mechanical correlations have been thought of as a paradox or, alternatively, as a sign of <em>incompleteness</em> of standard quantum theory. Certainly, from a logical point of view, paradox and incompleteness are not equivalent. The concept of "paradox" is thus analyzed and the possible ways out discussed. The so-called EPR-<em>paradox</em> is recast in an elementary logical form of a "debate argument", i.e., where two seemingly sound arguments contradict each other. A way out of it, that of <em>adding new dimensions, </em>is discussed and a very general mathematical formulation if offered. |
| − | [[Category:Unified Theory]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|quantum correlations logical point view]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Unified Theory|quantum correlations logical point view]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:51, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Quantum Correlations From a Logical Point of View |
| Author(s) | Nikos A Tambakis |
| Keywords | quantum correlations, logical, point of view, incompleteness, EPR paradox, mathematical formulation |
| Published | 1994 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 565-569 |
Abstract
Quantum mechanical correlations have been thought of as a paradox or, alternatively, as a sign of incompleteness of standard quantum theory. Certainly, from a logical point of view, paradox and incompleteness are not equivalent. The concept of "paradox" is thus analyzed and the possible ways out discussed. The so-called EPR-paradox is recast in an elementary logical form of a "debate argument", i.e., where two seemingly sound arguments contradict each other. A way out of it, that of adding new dimensions, is discussed and a very general mathematical formulation if offered.
