Difference between revisions of "Some Critiques of the Big Bang Cosmology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|some critiques big bang cosmology]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|some critiques big bang cosmology]] | ||
− | [[Category:Cosmology]] | + | [[Category:Cosmology|some critiques big bang cosmology]] |
Latest revision as of 19:55, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Some Critiques of the Big Bang Cosmology |
Read in full | Link to paper |
Author(s) | Jean-Claude Pecker |
Keywords | Cosmology, Big Bang |
Published | 1997 |
Journal | Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy |
Volume | 18 |
No. of pages | 11 |
Pages | 323-333 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Still more shocking than the metaphysical assumption of some initial singularity, is the constant insistence upon the so-called cosmological principle of ?homogeneity? and ?isotropy? of the Universe. Observations do contradict this principle. And to me, the inhomogeneous, fractal at least on a certain scale range, of the distribution of matter is in itself an important cosmological fact, hitherto almost neglected. Moreover difficultties as to the applicability of the second principle of thermodynamics, observations of abnormal redshifts, etc., are casting large doubts not only upon the standard cosmological models, but even on the interpretation of the observed redshift as due solely to a universal expansion.