Difference between revisions of "Some Experiments that Shook the World"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
− | It is generally believed by the physicists that various experiments/demonstrations/applications of Hahn-Strassmann, Walton-Cockroft, Fermi's Chicago Experiment, the explosion of the Little Boy and the Fat Man, the commercial reaction of nuclear fuel - prove <b>i)</b> conversion of gravitational mass into energy, and <b>ii)</b> usability of Uranium and other radioactive elements as proper fuels. We argue that these assertions have not been proved in any of those experiments/demonstarations/applications.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | It is generally believed by the physicists that various experiments/demonstrations/applications of Hahn-Strassmann, Walton-Cockroft, Fermi's Chicago Experiment, the explosion of the Little Boy and the Fat Man, the commercial reaction of nuclear fuel - prove <b>i)</b> conversion of gravitational mass into energy, and <b>ii)</b> usability of Uranium and other radioactive elements as proper fuels. We argue that these assertions have not been proved in any of those experiments/demonstarations/applications. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific Paper|experiments shook world]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity]] |
Revision as of 11:04, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Some Experiments that Shook the World |
Author(s) | Sankar Hajra |
Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
Published | 2010 |
Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
Volume | 21 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 13-17 |
Abstract
It is generally believed by the physicists that various experiments/demonstrations/applications of Hahn-Strassmann, Walton-Cockroft, Fermi's Chicago Experiment, the explosion of the Little Boy and the Fat Man, the commercial reaction of nuclear fuel - prove i) conversion of gravitational mass into energy, and ii) usability of Uranium and other radioactive elements as proper fuels. We argue that these assertions have not been proved in any of those experiments/demonstarations/applications.