Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...e famous paper written with Podolsky and Rosen in 1935, the celebrated EPR paradox or argument, he finally showed that the locality condition plus the reality
    1 KB (195 words) - 19:45, 1 January 2017
  • ...del is proposed, a model that fits with the ambiguous &lsquo;wave-particle paradox&rsquo;.</span> ...has already been explained in earlier papers. The so-called wave-particle paradox only expresses two mathematical properties of the orbiting motion during th
    6 KB (889 words) - 10:43, 1 January 2017
  • ...cal model is proposed, a model that fits with the ambiguous ?wave-particle paradox'. ...has already been explained in earlier papers. The so-called wave-particle paradox only expresses two mathematical properties of the orbiting motion during th
    4 KB (648 words) - 19:17, 1 January 2017
  • * 2006 - "[[Absolute Velocity Resolution of the Clock Paradox ]]" * 2006 - "[[Superluminal Signals and the Resolution of the Casual Paradox]]"
    8 KB (1,029 words) - 06:19, 2 January 2017
  • | keywords = [[Philosophy]], [[Paradox]], [[Dogma]] ...lativity, relative mass in motion especially at speeds approaching c, twin paradox as a function of time dilation, and presents author's recommendations for f
    4 KB (626 words) - 19:43, 1 January 2017
  • ...in Coulomb's law, it is possible to classically explain the "wave-particle paradox". A fifth issue is that of gravity. It is discussed, whether gravity might
    2 KB (322 words) - 20:11, 1 January 2017
  • | keywords = [[electrons]], [[photons]], [[EPR paradox]], [[quantum electrodynamics]]
    2 KB (213 words) - 19:38, 1 January 2017
  • ...d are the non-existence in quantum mechanics of waves and particles, so of wave-particle duality; the reason that general relativity must be the quantum theory of g
    2 KB (356 words) - 06:46, 2 January 2017
  • # <em>Eur. J. Phys.</em> 26 (2005) pp. 19-23, The rod-and-hole paradox re-examined * 2005 - "[[The Rod and Hole Paradox Re-examined]]" ([http://en.scientificcommons.org/22443828 Read in full])
    3 KB (353 words) - 12:44, 30 December 2016
  • ...ves this core-level problem by digging beneath the axiomatic wave-particle paradox and its attendant neuroses of ?weirdness,? indeterminacy and acausality--no
    4 KB (571 words) - 06:48, 2 January 2017
  • The photon population is virtually infinite. The Hologram Paradox arises from the fact that there are enough photons to produce an image of a
    2 KB (354 words) - 11:30, 1 January 2017
  • # Resolution of paradoxes, such as Twin paradox, Wave Particle duality and more
    2 KB (365 words) - 19:22, 1 January 2017
  • ...e and mass with velocity through the matrix. A simple solution to the twin paradox will be given. </div>
    1 KB (209 words) - 20:10, 1 January 2017
  • ...I once talked briefly on the telephone. Dingle's centrepiece was the Twin Paradox, which I argue is a kosher argument; the one argument that is allowed at th ...ical theory. It is much simpler and much more important than Dingle's Twin Paradox.
    5 KB (899 words) - 06:49, 2 January 2017
  • * Causal Superluminal Interpretation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox * Testing Wave-Particle Dualism with Time-Dependent Neutron Interferometry
    14 KB (2,092 words) - 06:41, 2 January 2017
  • ...[wave–particle duality]], instantaneous [[wave function collapse]] and the paradox of [[Schrödinger's cat]] but introducing [[Quantum_nonlocality|nonlocality
    20 KB (2,899 words) - 12:58, 6 February 2018
  • ...e background provided by the distant stars. There is then no clock or twin paradox.
    2 KB (276 words) - 06:42, 2 January 2017
  • ...allow for the particle and wave to be understood at the same time without paradox.</span>
    66 KB (8,163 words) - 12:38, 30 December 2016
  • * 2011 - "[[The Twin Paradox: Why it is Required by Relativity]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pd
    3 KB (435 words) - 13:10, 17 March 2019
  • ...tate]]<br>[[Superdeterminism]]<br>[[Chiral anomaly]]<br>[[Bell's spaceship paradox]]<br>[[Quantum entanglement]] ...University]], he wrote a paper entitled "On the [[Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox]]".<ref name="Bell1988">{{harvnb|Bell|1988}}</ref>{{rp|14}} In this work, h
    25 KB (3,483 words) - 12:59, 6 February 2018

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)