Difference between revisions of "Superluminal Velocities: Evidence for a New Kinematics?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Currently accepted explanations of the superluminal velocities reported by astronomers are characterized by a superunitary ratio of hypotheses to facts. This motivates a review of alternatives, beginning with doubts cast by investigations of Arp and Marmet on the distance scale of quasars and culminating in a reexamination of the foundations of kinematics. A simple analysis based on postulates of invariance of length and proper-time intervals leads to velocity nonreciprocity ? which explains the astronomical observations with logical economy. It also offers new perceptions concerning the well-known twin paradox. | Currently accepted explanations of the superluminal velocities reported by astronomers are characterized by a superunitary ratio of hypotheses to facts. This motivates a review of alternatives, beginning with doubts cast by investigations of Arp and Marmet on the distance scale of quasars and culminating in a reexamination of the foundations of kinematics. A simple analysis based on postulates of invariance of length and proper-time intervals leads to velocity nonreciprocity ? which explains the astronomical observations with logical economy. It also offers new perceptions concerning the well-known twin paradox. | ||
− | [[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|superluminal velocities evidence new kinematics]] |
Latest revision as of 11:08, 1 January 2017
Scientific Paper | |
---|---|
Title | Superluminal Velocities: Evidence for a New Kinematics? |
Author(s) | Thomas E Phipps |
Keywords | Superluminal Velocities, Kinematics |
Published | 1989 |
Journal | Physics Essays |
Volume | 2 |
Number | 2 |
Pages | 180-185 |
Abstract
Currently accepted explanations of the superluminal velocities reported by astronomers are characterized by a superunitary ratio of hypotheses to facts. This motivates a review of alternatives, beginning with doubts cast by investigations of Arp and Marmet on the distance scale of quasars and culminating in a reexamination of the foundations of kinematics. A simple analysis based on postulates of invariance of length and proper-time intervals leads to velocity nonreciprocity ? which explains the astronomical observations with logical economy. It also offers new perceptions concerning the well-known twin paradox.