Difference between revisions of "The Failure of Quantum Mechanics"
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The empirically correct classical quantum theory is briefly outlined for comparison with empirically impossible orthodox quantum mechanics: The de Broglie wave cannot represent a physical wave. A wave packet doe snot exist. A single particle wave does not exist. The operator approach fails. The ambiguous complex representation with imaginary number i = (-1 makes it impossible to fit initial and boundary conditions. The arbitrary quantum mechanical particle flux and density are not observed. Bound states cannot be motionless. The wave function is not a probability amplitude. The uncertainty principle with its huge uncertainties fails drastically. EPR demonstrate the failure of quantum mechanics. The quantum mechanical claim of instantaneous action at a distance without any physical mechanism involved is pure mysticism. Hidden variables are not necessary. Claims of experimentally violating Bell's inequality are fraudulent.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The empirically correct classical quantum theory is briefly outlined for comparison with empirically impossible orthodox quantum mechanics: The de Broglie wave cannot represent a physical wave. A wave packet doe snot exist. A single particle wave does not exist. The operator approach fails. The ambiguous complex representation with imaginary number i = (-1 makes it impossible to fit initial and boundary conditions. The arbitrary quantum mechanical particle flux and density are not observed. Bound states cannot be motionless. The wave function is not a probability amplitude. The uncertainty principle with its huge uncertainties fails drastically. EPR demonstrate the failure of quantum mechanics. The quantum mechanical claim of instantaneous action at a distance without any physical mechanism involved is pure mysticism. Hidden variables are not necessary. Claims of experimentally violating Bell's inequality are fraudulent. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|failure quantum mechanics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The Failure of Quantum Mechanics |
| Author(s) | Paul Wesley |
| Keywords | Quantum Mechanics |
| Published | 1996 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 381-394 |
Abstract
The empirically correct classical quantum theory is briefly outlined for comparison with empirically impossible orthodox quantum mechanics: The de Broglie wave cannot represent a physical wave. A wave packet doe snot exist. A single particle wave does not exist. The operator approach fails. The ambiguous complex representation with imaginary number i = (-1 makes it impossible to fit initial and boundary conditions. The arbitrary quantum mechanical particle flux and density are not observed. Bound states cannot be motionless. The wave function is not a probability amplitude. The uncertainty principle with its huge uncertainties fails drastically. EPR demonstrate the failure of quantum mechanics. The quantum mechanical claim of instantaneous action at a distance without any physical mechanism involved is pure mysticism. Hidden variables are not necessary. Claims of experimentally violating Bell's inequality are fraudulent.
