Difference between revisions of "The General Electromagnetic Formulation of the Unipolar Induction Problem"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Imported from text file) |
(Imported from text file) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
| − | The general electromagnetic induction problem is formulated in three ways: from the Weber equation proposed in 1846; from the classical equation generally taught today: and from the new Gaussian equation recently proposed by Moon, Spencer, Mirchandaney, Shama, and Mann. The angular velocity of the copper conductor (Omega) and the angular velocity of the magnetic field Q are arbitrary.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | + | The general electromagnetic induction problem is formulated in three ways: from the Weber equation proposed in 1846; from the classical equation generally taught today: and from the new Gaussian equation recently proposed by Moon, Spencer, Mirchandaney, Shama, and Mann. The angular velocity of the copper conductor (Omega) and the angular velocity of the magnetic field Q are arbitrary. |
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific Paper|general electromagnetic formulation unipolar induction problem]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:16, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | The General Electromagnetic Formulation of the Unipolar Induction Problem |
| Author(s) | Domina Eberle Spencer, Philip J Mann |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 1998 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
The general electromagnetic induction problem is formulated in three ways: from the Weber equation proposed in 1846; from the classical equation generally taught today: and from the new Gaussian equation recently proposed by Moon, Spencer, Mirchandaney, Shama, and Mann. The angular velocity of the copper conductor (Omega) and the angular velocity of the magnetic field Q are arbitrary.
